On 7/18/05, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/18/05, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
I wrote
Pleasant enough reading some of my stuff there,
but they make no
reference I can see to WP or GFDL.
I see that reference to the source is in fact buried in their Terms of Use
page
http://www.mathdaily.com/copyright.html.
Also notice that the notice at the bottom of every page just says
"Copyright 2005 MathDaily.com", without mentioning the GFDL. Obviously
they're entitled to hold copyright over their headers and sidebars,
but are reusers allowed to bury the GFDL notice like that?
Take a look at [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks]] and
[[Wikipedia:Copyrights]], which recommends a small notice and link
back to both the wikipedia article and a copy of the GFDL on every
article. I guess the link back satisfies the requirement for author
attribution.
[[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/GFDL Compliance]] makes it look like no
one has sent a first letter to MathDaily.
Laura