-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Skyring wrote:
I've just spotted this on the talk page of a user:
"I will revert all
edits to all articles on my watchlist by the LaRouche cult "editor"
Cognition, or any other recognisable LaRouche editor. I will do this
until either the LaRouche cultists are banned from Wikipedia or I am.
I don't much care which, since an encyclopaedia which allows crackpot
cultists to edit its articles is not worth writing for."
Now, to my poor understanding, this user is threatening to revert any
edits made to any article on his 1000+ witchlist, regardless of merit,
so long as that edit is made by someone he identifies as a particular
sort of crackpot.
What I know about LaRouche could be summed up in one word, but surely
Wikipedia is not going to be destroyed by the presence or absence of
one particular editor?
(why did you reply to the 'disclaimer at the bottom of wikipedia pages'
thread?)
Who is this user who has made this statement? The only reason, I can
see, for someone to make reverts to every edit a person makes is if that
person is hard-banned. I'm guessing (maybe hoping) that the person who
said this is just in a bad mood.
Chris
P.S. I also know nothing about LaRouche.
- --
Chris Jenkinson
chris(a)starglade.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC1CZaEq6+ijeBrJ8RAuEIAJ99soO8GsRA16qNFTOk5MTSBS75/ACfbjUm
lV35cNg3Ul9/fWgOGWrsOOI=
=zAA+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----