On 7/1/05, Dan Grey dangrey@gmail.com wrote:
What was the original purpose of the Rollback - purely to revert vandalism? And is it considered bad form to use it to revert good-faith edits by other editors (not troublemakers)?
I asked a similar question (a very long wikitime ago)
Brion replied: "Its intent is solely to be a timesaving shortcut for reverting mass vandalism."
Reverting good faith edits without explanation shouldn't be done, and the rollback prevents any explanation, giving the impression that you are viewing the other person's edits as vandalism, so I would suggest that it is bad form to use it in that way.
Angela.