JAY JG (jayjg(a)hotmail.com) [050125 05:19]:
From: David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au>
>I see no reason why each of the thousands of
secondary references shouldn't
>have attention paid to them in principle. We have a reference checking
>project, after all.
A great idea, in principle.
As I said, it's susceptible to abuse by the querulous. But that's an editor
problem. How far is too far? At what point do we cull querulousness without
forestalling questioning of a reference seriously considered (in good
faith) to be dubious?
- d.