JAY JG (jayjg@hotmail.com) [050125 05:19]: From: David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au
I see no reason why each of the thousands of secondary references shouldn't have attention paid to them in principle. We have a reference checking project, after all.
A great idea, in principle.
As I said, it's susceptible to abuse by the querulous. But that's an editor problem. How far is too far? At what point do we cull querulousness without forestalling questioning of a reference seriously considered (in good faith) to be dubious?
- d.