JAY JG said:
I
don't see exactly why Bard (or any other person) would be obligated to
respond to every anonymous individual who e-mailed him on the internet
demanding information, or how his response (or lack thereof) would be
relevant to a well-cited reference.
Well if as I have done one has gone to the UN report on the UN website
(which is probably incomplete because its author was assassinated by
Jewish renegades very shortly after sending part of it) and failed to find
the full text, and nevertheless found conflicting texts on (for instance)
Avalon, it is absolutely imperative that the citation, which is ''de
facto'' incorrect, either be remedied by the originator or omitted
entirely. Be a good chap, remove your claim or modify it to conform with
the known facts.