Bjorn, here are another two pages as examples: [[Schiller Institute}
and [[LaRouche Youth Movement]], both part of the LaRouche movement.
The first is regarded by researchers who know it as a dangerous,
far-right organization, with ties to far-right movements in Germany
where the Schiller Institute is based. Its founder, LaRouche's wife,
has made explicit Holocaust denial statements. But there is nothing
about this in the article.
After a protracted edit war, I was allowed to say that its "critics"
regard it as a cult, and insert a paragraph on [[Jeremiah Duggan]], a
young man who died after attending one of their "cadre schools." The
institute has nothing to do with Friedrich Schiller, the founder is
not the world's leading expert on Schiller, as the article says (or
any kind of expert). They are a dodgy political organization, not a
musical one, yet look how much play the music gets.
The [[LaRouche Youth Movement]], started after LaRouche got out of
jail, now has young members all over the world thanks to the Internet.
It is unquestionably a cult, with members encouraged to live
collectively, spend all their time raising money for the movement, and
receiving almost none of it for their upkeep. Ex-members have given
interviews about how they were forced to undergo "ego-stripping" as
part of their indoctrination. Again, there is nothing about this in
the article. I was only allowed my one paragraph about the death of
Jeremiah Duggan.
Finally, look at [[Template:LaRouche Talk]]. These are the Talk
archives the LaRouche editors have caused in just a few months, as
various editors try to get something close to the truth into these
articles, but instead get worn down by the endless talk, the calls for
mediation, the calls for arbitration, and the insults. So they give
up, as I am about to do.
Slim