JAY JG said:
From:
"Tony Sidaway" <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
This would be a month of trying to persuade the culprit to be a good
boy. Most of us regard this as A Good Thing.
A month of unsupported original research and POV nonsense present in an
article that we are trying to promote as a reliable alternative to
paper encyclopedias. A month in which this editor no doubt goes on to
insert similar junk into other articles.
Rubbish tends not to last long. Junk references get deleted: if not by
you, by someone else.
POV warriors will always be with us. I don't think this can be solved by
giving you and your mates encouragement to go edit warring. especially
since one of your primary justifications to this seems to be that others
cannot tell which of you is POV pushing and which of you is "warring for
truth", as it were. If we armed you, we'd also be arming your opponent.
And if he's as bad as you say he is, that would make things much worse!
Speaking purely for myself, I wish you'd *all* stop warring. It seems to
me that the 3RR is a good way of doing that, and I'm not about to let that
go.