First off, I'm in no way affiliated with NSK or wikinerds. In fact, I find it to be a very boring site that I wont waste my time on. Bug NSK:s very polite request and the answers, some of which was very rude that he got, got me thinking. What if NSK continues to do what he is currently doing? After all, everyone has a self-interest, some acknowledge it, others don't, NSK is atleast honest about it. Then when someone thinks that NSK has inappropriately inserted a link to his site and reverts it AND NSK disagrees with their judgement he contacts me. I will then, as an impartial observer, look at what the link links to and in which Wikipedia page it was inserted and determine if that link belongs or should be removed. Ofcourse I would not have the final say in such disagreements. It is just that then the disagreement would be between me, if I find the link fitting and someone else doesn't, instead of with NSK. I think that would be beneficial because I'm just a random Wikipedian who can gain nothing from link-spamming to wikinerds. Strange idea maybe, but totally serious.