On Wednesday 12 January 2005 07:39, Josh Gerdes wrote:
Well, the site does not really look like spam to me, and it certainly seems informational. Does it provide any information that it not in any of the other links, though? (I do not know, as I have not read the content of the other linked sites.)
Thank you for responding. I believe that my report is informational and useful to the reader, but in the end this is something that will be decided by the readers and Wikipedia users themselves. What I insist, though, is that it was not spam. If the link is about to be kept removed, it should be for another reason (non-informational or otherwise, I welcome any constructive criticism) but not because someone thought it was spam. I hope you can understand me.