On Wednesday 12 January 2005 07:39, Josh Gerdes wrote:
Well, the site does not really look like spam to me,
and it certainly
seems informational. Does it provide any information that it not in any
of the other links, though? (I do not know, as I have not read the
content of the other linked sites.)
Thank you for responding. I believe that my report is informational and useful
to the reader, but in the end this is something that will be decided by the
readers and Wikipedia users themselves. What I insist, though, is that it was
not spam. If the link is about to be kept removed, it should be for another
reason (non-informational or otherwise, I welcome any constructive criticism)
but not because someone thought it was spam. I hope you can understand me.
--
NSK
Visit my wiki at
http://jnana.wikinerds.org