--- David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
Basically, not making it en-only was so OBVIOUSLY the
right thing (because,
ahh, it isn't en-only - en's front page is
en.wikipedia.org) that people
just went 'w00t!' and dived right in.
I'm well aware of that and completely agree. I just don't like the fact that we
went live with a lame solution before developing something good. I know that
wikiwiki has always been cart-before-horse, but this is *very* visible real
estate.
-- mav
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com