--- David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Basically, not making it en-only was so OBVIOUSLY the right thing (because, ahh, it isn't en-only - en's front page is en.wikipedia.org) that people just went 'w00t!' and dived right in.
I'm well aware of that and completely agree. I just don't like the fact that we went live with a lame solution before developing something good. I know that wikiwiki has always been cart-before-horse, but this is *very* visible real estate.
-- mav
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com