David Gerard wrote:
Tony Sidaway (minorityreport@bluebottle.com) [050106 20:31]:
I have drafted a clarification for WP:3RR. It now reads: '''If you violate the three revert rule, after your fourth revert in 24 hours sysops may block you for up to 24 hours. In the cases where multiple parties violate the rule, sysops should treat all sides equally.''' The added text is "after your fourth revert in 24 hours". Please check and copy edit.
Looks like an obvious clarification to me.
Does anyone have a good working definition of 'near-revert'? It seems to be consensus that not-quite-reverts count as reverts for 3RR purposes, but I notice [[WP:3RR]] is actually silent on the matter.
- d.
Precisely what I'd like to know, too. This is the most troubling part of enforcing the 3RR; admins have to make a judgement call, and they may very well be damned if they do and damned if they don't.
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])