So we should just shrug our shoulders when we witness "informal
deviation and transgressions especially by high status individuals"?
Are you serious with this stuff? And so the humble editor is trampled
on cuz he ainted got friends in high places? Unbelievable.
Policy should be applied, and seen to be applied, fairly and evenly,
no matter what "informal status" a person might have. I thought an
arbitrator would agree to that!
Fred wants the so-called "laws of sociology" to overrule wikipedia
policy. Is this an offical ArbCom line?
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0700, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
All formal organizations and their rules are subject
to informal deviation
and transgressions especially by high status individuals. We have not
outlawed the laws of sociology just by creating a cool website.
Fred
From: nas ral <jewishneoconipod(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: nas ral <jewishneoconipod(a)gmail.com>om>, English Wikipedia
<wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:29:48 +0000
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Query admin powers
Authority rests with the wikipedia community, not with admins. Funny
how editors without favor are never cut any slack? Wikipedia is not a
club of friends, shaking hands and letting them get away with
transgressions. It is the two wikipedias. Real fair. As long as these
double standards are perpetuated, with what respect can admins be
held?
I don't have to be fool to break rules, just an admin.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l