JAY JG (jayjg@hotmail.com) [050101 07:21]:
I'm still disturbed with the recent case of a dedicated and extremely abusive troll/POV pusher who created a dozen sockpuppets and edited using them with near impunity on Wikipedia for months. His ArbCom case is still slowly dragging its way through the process, not even a temporary injunction yet.
The ArbCom case is being pushed at the moment (in our first 6 1/2 hours, the new arbitrators have been hacking away at the backlog ... why am I still up, and why am I online?).
The socks are blocked and so is the user (for glaring sock abuse for policy-violating purposes and because we're still sorting out the mess). Which isn't an entirely elegant solution providing a way forward, but does stop the abusiveness for the moment.
I'd really like to see a decent wording for 'No personal attacks, block after warning' that would be objective enough to make it through a vote, like the last one didn't.
- d.