Stan Shebs wrote:
Justin Cormack wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 21:41 +0800, John Lee wrote:
I believe the {{unreferenced}} template already exists. I've seen it quite a few times, but not often enough, IMO. I'm a fanatic on citing sources, but some of the old ones I started that I don't really have much interest in (like [[chicken nugget]] and [[double-decker bus]]) don't have references yet (AFAIK).
Well lets start putting it in more.
Yes, things with little interest are an issue.
I think I will have to make full list of articles I am interested in being good that I have contributed to, and prune my watchlist of the stuff that I just made small fixes to and dont really care about in order to make this improvement thing work.
I might however have a few erudite references for chicken nugget in my large pile of history of food books.
I wonder how many people hold off adding references because they're hoping for a better source. For instance, I used to not mention using Oxford Classical Dictionary, because it's technically a tertiary source, but many of its articles mention only primary sources, leaving no secondaries to cite. Nowadays I just cite it anyway - if somebody has something better later, they can replace the OCD cite.
Stan
I always cite any possible source - even tertiary ones. They're better than nothing at all, and when someone with a better source comes along, they can be replaced.
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])