-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
David Gerard stated for the record:
I added a note about how not to get an ulcer from the broken DRV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADeletion_review&di... Splash added a mild threat: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review&diff... DS1953 removed it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review&diff... Splash replaced it by rollback: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review&diff... Titoxd removed both as "flammable materials": http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review&diff...
DRV regulars appear convinced it is a fiefdom unto itself, with only a passing consideration at best of writing an encyclopedia rather than fetishisation of process. If there's more than me with the notice on their user pages about undeletion for viewing, it would be worth listing a bunch at a time per my original notice.
Done. Wanna see if we can tag-team someone into 3RR violation? ;->
- -- Sean Barrett | How much does it cost to have sean@epoptic.org | the Internet installed?