On 12/11/05, Mark Gallagher m.g.gallagher@student.canberra.edu.au wrote:
G'day Anthony,
On 12/9/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/9/05, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
Yes, you've confused what I've said. I think we should add more *objective* criteria to the speedy deletion candidates, not *subjective* ones.
If totaly objective criteria don't turn up much outside maths
I find it hard to believe that we can't come up with objective criteria for articles that everyone agrees should be deleted. Verifiability, for instance, is an objective criterion.
Verifiability is necessary, but not sufficient, for an encyclopaedic article. But not everyone agrees on that (IIRC, you yourself have gone to great --- perhaps even "extreme" --- lengths to show your disagreement).
Verifiability is in some ways quite a harsh requirement. It was what got [[yoism]] deleted.
-- geni