On 12/10/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying that turning off AFD, or using an alternative tagging method like the one speedy uses now allows for articles that should be deleted to slip through the net. Especially when they have 2 weeks or a month to be manipulated.
Umm, you're saying that giving an article that "should be deleted" might, given time, actually improve to the point where it cannot be deleted? Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
If it *is* what you're saying, then obviously that's wrong! We cannot have people improving articles that someone else thinks should exist! That will never do! :)