I wasn't speculating, I was making an observation. I apologise if
anyone felt it was flamebait, or overly personal. I felt it touched on
a very important fact, the views on policy presented publically by a
newly appointed arbiter.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 8/25/05, steve v <vertigosteve(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I dont think the last few comments have been very
helpful. Jay has yet to give Michael a straight answer
on the specific block issue. Jays claim that the use
of an ancient ethnic name as provokational is really
very one-sided and has little substance, as is his
representation of that history. And Jack's personal
speculations about Jay's objectivity are flamebait at
best.
SV
" And let's also not forget..let's not forget...
Dude..that keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for
uh, domestic, you know, within the city... That isn't
legal either."
--- Jack Lynch <jack.i.lynch(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This discussion keeps reminding me of a photo I
saw
once that moved me
alot (I can't seem to find it now). In it a black
woman had thrown
herself on top of a severely beaten KKK member in
order to save him
from an angry crowd. She had the moral highground.
The newly appointed
arbiter appears not to.
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l