No, he's quite specifically stated that his theory is that Wikipedia currently has a "pro-Jewish" bias, because it is run by a Jewish cabal.
True.
His edits themselves had little value, and he has encouraged people to join Wikipedia and target certain users based on their ethnicity, and to use anonymous proxies to edit (which he admits to using himself).
In the discussion I saw he pointed out that the best way to avoid being blocked was not to use anonymous proxies (although he was clearly familiar with that too) but to create a username and stick to the rules. That this method seems to have failed him does not, I think, reflect well on us. All it will do is get him back to using open proxies.
Furthermore, he has said some pretty vile things about Wikipedians, admittedly on other boards; but if he had posted a list of Wikipedians who he thought were "niggers", I wonder if the consensus for banning him would be stronger. Perhaps the word "kike" doesn't have quite the same taboo quality.
The precise ethnic slur used would not make any difference to me. As far as I know 'kike' is just as offensive as 'nigger' but I'm not a native English speaker.
Also, how many people here would really monitor his edits, and actually spend the effort trying to figure out if they were really NPOV, aside from those he has targeted?
I hereby volunteer to watch his edits and revert and comment as appropriate if he is unbanned and returns to editing. That's one. Jack, you in? Anyone else?
Finally, as has been pointed out, his failure to significantly disrupt Wikipedia was not for lack of trying.
I disagree. I don't think he had any intention of disrupting Wikipedia. He certainly did want his own POV to be better represented, though.
Regards, Haukur