Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real
partisan Jewish
douchebag, and he seems omnipresent." That one really hurt.
Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat?
Come now, it's an attribute of deity (depending on one's theological
position), and you should be flattered that they recognize your natural
superiority.
--Michael Snow
:-O
Jay.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
From:
Arkady Rose <arkady(a)arkady.org.uk>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:46:03 +0100
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
JAY JG wrote:
Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of
Wikipedia; it turns out
the chief Jew is Jimbo himself:
[
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311] They also
appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup
IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to
get around blocks.
Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish
douchebag, and he seems omnipresent." That one really hurt.
Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to
"Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really
is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused
of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the
Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
Of course that would then lead to questions of whether it's a
Gardnerian, Alexandrian, Lycian or Eclectiv coven - but hey, these are
neo-nazis who don't let a little thing like religious accuracy get in
their way. We're all devil worshippers and Jimbo sacrifices babies at
the clambake every third Tuesday of the month, right?
;-)
- Arkady (who happens to be Wiccan....)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] An admin misused his privilages to block me...
From:
MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:58:49 +0200
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
I've seen a lot of vandalism coming from schools and universities, but
I've yet to see vandalism from the uni I attend.
--Mgm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] An admin misused his privilages to block me...
From:
Theresa Knott <theresaknott(a)gmail.com>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:08:06 +0100
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
On 8/22/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've seen a lot of vandalism coming from
schools and universities, but
I've yet to see vandalism from the uni I attend.
Possible conclusions
Students from your university are exceptionally well behaved.
Your university is very small.
No one from your university bothers to do research on the web and so
has never come across wikipedia. (except you)
Everyone from your university (except you of course) is too stupid to
work out that "edit this page" means they can edit a page.
Your university is not connected to the Internet.
Takes yer pick ;-)
Theresa
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
From:
"Zachary Harden" <zscout370(a)hotmail.com>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:20:20 +0000
To:
wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To:
wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of
tech skills, nor from lack of users. It is lack of dough. From looking
at what Wikimedia needs to raise and see how much they spend on just
running the sites, I do not think Stormfront would have enough dough
to pull it off. And most companies will probably not waste their time
or money dealing with neo-Nazis. It's very, very un-PC for companies
to deal with fascists.
Regards,
Zachary Harden
From: Arkady Rose <arkady(a)arkady.org.uk>
Reply-To: arkady(a)arkady.org.uk,English Wikipedia
<wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:46:03 +0100
JAY JG wrote:
Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of
Wikipedia; it turns out
the chief Jew is Jimbo himself:
[
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311] They also
appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup
IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to
get around blocks.
Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish
douchebag, and he seems omnipresent." That one really hurt.
Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to
"Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really
is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused
of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the
Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
Of course that would then lead to questions of whether it's a
Gardnerian, Alexandrian, Lycian or Eclectiv coven - but hey, these are
neo-nazis who don't let a little thing like religious accuracy get in
their way. We're all devil worshippers and Jimbo sacrifices babies at
the clambake every third Tuesday of the month, right?
;-)
- Arkady (who happens to be Wiccan....)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] Unnecessary and improper article dating
From:
Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:21:33 -0400
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To:
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
steve v wrote:
The Iraq War article has recently been formed to
consolodate the term under something a bit more
substantive than a disambiguation. There remains the
issue of unnecessary dating of events, where such
events are uniquely enough referenced and titled to
warrant more common terms. There are thousands of
cases where we use the common term instead of a more
official term, so why then is there a persistence in
using a unique standard using titles prefaced with a
date?
The problem is that it isn't always agreed when something is "uniquely
enough referenced and titled to warrant more common terms", especially
taking a historical view. Many news organizations today speak of the
"London terrorist attacks", for example, but obviously Wikipedia needs
to use a more specific article title since there have been multiple
London terrorist attacks over the years.
-Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
From:
"JAY JG" <jayjg(a)hotmail.com>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:27:48 -0400
To:
wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To:
wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
From: "Zachary Harden"
<zscout370(a)hotmail.com>
Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of
tech skills, nor from lack of users.
I think it would be more likely to fail due to the many obvious
failings of its proponents. See, for example, the posts of
JohnJoyTree in that thread, the only one there who appears to have a
clue.
Jay.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
From:
Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.org>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:32:31 -0700
To:
arkady(a)arkady.org.uk, English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To:
arkady(a)arkady.org.uk, English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Arkady Rose stated for the record:
What had me giggling was the line about 'the
term "Wiki" refers to
"Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really
is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused
of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the
Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
There are twelve of us on the ArbComm, and Jimbo makes thirt-- oh,
wait, I shouldn't have said that. THERE ARE NO SECRET MEMBERS OF THE
CABAL. FNORD.
Crap. Now I'm going to have to use the Orbital Mind Control Lasers to
erase their knowledge of the Secret 33rd-Degree Arbiters....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l