-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
JAY JG wrote:
Hmm, here's the plan Amalekite is proposing:
"I think that if there were enough white nationalists there (or at least
more people who are Jew-wise, even if they are not white or tend to lean
more to the libertarian left), the Zionist cabal would have a tough time
keeping control. The Wikipedia system itself is pretty open and neutral
- it's just that the place is infested with Jews. There's not even that
many Jews there that I'd consider to be among the "Elders of Wikipedia"
- maybe just 20 to 30 in all. That's why I think it's such a shame to
let the bastards rule it. The kikes there are undoubtedly smart, but I
think more importantly, they're well-organized, persistant, and know how
the system works. If 20 or 30 of us could form a loose network on
Wikipedia and basically follow in the Jews' example (i.e. synchronize
our votes on important issues, support each others' edits, elect each
other to administrator positions, contest the neutrality of the Jews'
favorite articles, etc.), we could make life very difficult for them. If
60 of us were on there, we could probably seize control from them for
good."
Not the first time they've thought of doing this. I wonder if they'll
follow through this time.
Not that I could be bothered, but there's nothing to stop us doing
exactly the same back to them :)
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDB/Pf/RxM5Ph0xhMRA2LEAKCkLiQsU+WPzB/vK0+uDtkKhAnZ7QCeLZCn
+neI1rDiqBZ3QCHsOa2JnXU=
=SJWj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----