On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:45:03PM +0100, Tony Sidaway wrote:
Kevin Rector said:
My position (and again, so that you can cool your jets -- it has nothing to do with porn) is that we should be very hesitant to link to pay sites in articles where the purpose of the site is to be a pay site.
I agree with this. In practise so-called "pay sites" tend to have a lot of freebies--especially porn-based sites. This may sometimes make them worth linking to.
Of course, the very existence of a pay-site might be informative to the reader, in that it says something about the person who runs the site.
-- Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ]