Whose workplace? I know a couple who who work in a sex-toy shop. Their work involves using words like "clitoris" and "fellatio" (though they'd almost certainly use earthier terms) all day.
I think we all know what is being refured to
Attempting to reduce Wikipedia to some kind of lowest common denominator of inoffensiveness is just as absurd on the grounds of "being work-safe" as it is on the grounds of "being child-safe". It is an impossible goal; but attempting to pursue it can cause untold harm to the project in the form of chilling effects, irreconcilable disputes, and biased coverage.
Evidence?
Wikipedia doesn't need censorious categorization. We are getting on _just fine_ without it. Speculations of the sort, "If we don't put up some kind of censorship, we could get sued!" are the "Niger yellowcake" of this discussion -- a nonexistent threat that is being pounded on to justify a preexisting agenda.
Evidence? Are you a lawer? Are you giving your formal legal opion?