geni said:
Tony Sidaway said:
Kevin Rector said: I've come to the realization that people are searching out nude pictures to put in the 'pedia. They are looking to stir up trouble, mostly to make a point. I take this very seriously. What's your supporting evidence?
The suspicious speed they have been turning up since the clitorsis incerdent. Not that I really care. Sonner or latter this will be settled because everyone will be totaly fed up (the power of apathy to settle dissputes)
Which clitoris incident are you referring to? According to evidence I prepared for Arbcom for the Dr Zen case, there has been an inline photograph on Clitoris ever since Anthere replaced the linked image by an inline in May, 2004.
Could you give examples from the upload log? Something demonstrating that there is a person or a number of persons uploading nude images in a way that suggests that people are actually "searching out nude pictures to put in the 'pedia?" I'd expect to see a pattern of certain people uploading more than one such picture and trying to sneak it into an article in an inappropriate way. Do we in fact have good evidence of this? You mention a "suspicious speed"? What is your estimate for the rate at which nude photographs are being uploaded to Wikipedia?