Jimmy Wales wrote:
If you think we get silly complaints now about sysop abuse, just imagine what it would be like if we let sysops win arguments over content by blocking people who disagree.
Of course you are right. However, I did not block him to win an argument over content but to stop his vandalism. The issue was not over the content of the material but the fact that his only source for it was a pirate radio station well known for inventing news stories. He has been inserting material from this same source for months despite repeated complaints from many editors, and the time has passed for it to be regarded as vandalism. If the same material is found in a respectable source, there would be no problem.
Having said that, in my frustration it appears that I went further than the rules for dealing with vandals permit. As you say, I should have consulted another sysop. I won't do it again. In fact I might not do anything again as I am reconsidering my involvement in Wikipedia altogether. This is not a reaction to this particular event but a more general issue that I will write a separate note on.
--Zero
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail