On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:52:16 -0500, Phil Sandifer sandifer@sbcglobal.net wrote:
At the risk of feeding the trolls.
- Raul did not say you made an ad hominem attack. He said that your
defense was ad hominem - that is, you were defending yourself by criticizing your accusers, instead of by engaging the evidence in any way.
- Raul did not refuse to look at evidence. He asked you to present him
with evidence. "Read this talk page" is not evidence. Evidence would be a link to a specific problem edit.
- I'm not sure why you just found out today when Raul left a message
on your talk page on the 6th, especially since it's not as though you weren't around between now and then.
That said, if this case has been going since August 1st, why didn't anyone leave a note on RK's talk page until a month into the case?
FWIW, I don't think PP was *ever* notified about my case against him.
Pak