Jens Ropers wrote:
Well, then I must have been dreaming when I removed all these "what would Jesus say" - Christiospams from totally unrelated topics. And the folks insinuating that the "Vietcong", not the U.S. had used Napalm in Vietnam must have been entirely correct as well, I guess.
I didn't say all articles, but the general slant. There are attempts to bash Bush thrown into completely unrelated articles; the "Rumsfeld shaking hands with Hussein" images gets shoved into any article that could possibly be related by five degrees of separation; the "anti-American sentiment" articles are mostly a laundry-list of "why the US sux"; the mother theresa article is about 50% "why mother theresa sux"; and there's a whole pile of "what would Marx say" spams in totally unrelated topics. There's also an odd strong pro-science-establishment bias, as evidence by the fact that most of our psychology articles are basically the (controversial) "party line" from American Psychiatry Association's _Diagnostic and Statistical Manual_.
-Mark