Peter Jaros wrote:
On May 12, 2004, at 5:33 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
You have not offered a single plausible counter-argument on why, for example, this would be any different from moving criticisms of Mother Teresa to a separate page if the majority does not like to read about them.
Fair enough. I would say that the primary difference between text and image in this case is that text can be skimmed and skipped. It is *much* harder to avoid an image, especially an image one finds disturbing or offensive.
Text can also be edited to change nuances. Where in a longer text some would call a national leader a "dictator" it is easy to change that term to "president". We can't make that sort of change in a photograph.
Ec