I agree with Christian - its got the flare of a Hearst newspaper in the 1890's, but You seem reasonable enough to warrant not being blocked outright. Can you consider moderating your tone a bit - read the News style article.. for articles that depend on the original and new reporting of pro outfits, quoting the sources (until matters settle) is fine. To do otherwise is conjecture, regardless of how its put. See below *
Zero, I understand your frustration but IMHO would like you to report more facts and less characterization. Links to the relevant articles you mention would be nice too. So far Harry has provided several, and these would seem to support his version of events, albeit not his characterization of it...
*"The bbc reports the event as a series of differing reports:Some witnesses said the young man was killed by militants whom he saw burying an anti-tank mine near his house on a track used by Israeli patrols. Other reports suggest he was shot by Israeli troops. Our correspondent reports there was an exchange of fire between the residents and the militants. Several people were injured. In the past, ordinary people in the town, which lies close to Gaza's border, have said they support efforts to confront Israel. But our correspondent says they have also made clear that they feel their town is being made to bear too heavy a burden - that militant action is causing them to suffer too much at the hands of the Israeli army.
S
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail