> Let's talk about why the violations of some
users are ignored,
> such as Blankfaze during the exact same edit war that got me banned.
For the record, during that edit war, I reverted
exactly 4 times.
Orginally, only 3, but [[User:Danny]] told me to revert a 4th time and
he would protect the page. Ask him... I was rather hesistant to break
the 3 revert rule.
So not only did you break the 3-revert guideline without any repercussions,
you were actually *encouraged* to do so by another admin. In my opinion
that only raises more questions.
It's meant for vandalism of any kind, anonymous or
no. And yes, I agree
that according to our policies, this situation should not be handled
with the rollback button, which is why I brought up the point in the
first place.
I was basing my statement on [[Wikipedia:Administrators]] which says that
the revert button "expedites the reversion of edits by anonymous vandals."
I'm not sure where there's an actual guideline as to how it should be used,
though.