Michael Snow wrote:
>What's really appalling is that in many
instances, not even the talk
>page of the disputed article is being used. The only communication going
>on is through edit summaries, and since those typically consist of "rv",
>accusations of vandalism, snide remarks, or the pre-filled edit summary
>from an admin using the rollback button, it's worse than useless.
If we're going to have a rollback button, I have a request: a text box
for a meaningful summary next to it. It can start filled with the
present default summary, but make it easy to make a rollback meaningful.
- d.