Michael Snow wrote:
What's really appalling is that in many instances, not even the talk page of the disputed article is being used. The only communication going on is through edit summaries, and since those typically consist of "rv", accusations of vandalism, snide remarks, or the pre-filled edit summary from an admin using the rollback button, it's worse than useless.
If we're going to have a rollback button, I have a request: a text box for a meaningful summary next to it. It can start filled with the present default summary, but make it easy to make a rollback meaningful.
- d.