blankfaze wrote:
I realise that the "rules" naming [[User:Raul654]] as de facto administrator of the feature template aren't really written down anywhere, that they're moreso common knowledge (or so I thought)... And maybe that was a mistake from the beginning. Maybe it was just asking for trouble.
Yes, in retrospect of course that is obvious. And I don't think that there is anyone, not even Raul654, who would argue that in the long run, it makes sense to have a single person in charge of such an important thing without any formal means of oversight, etc.
But, it was a convenience and a custom, and since there would of course be universal consensus to move forward with a different scheme, there was absolutely no reason to have an episode of civil disobedience to change it. There was no emergency.
--Jimbo