blankfaze wrote:
I realise that the "rules" naming
[[User:Raul654]] as de facto
administrator of the feature template aren't really written down
anywhere, that they're moreso common knowledge (or so I thought)...
And maybe that was a mistake from the beginning. Maybe it was just
asking for trouble.
Yes, in retrospect of course that is obvious. And I don't think that
there is anyone, not even Raul654, who would argue that in the long
run, it makes sense to have a single person in charge of such an
important thing without any formal means of oversight, etc.
But, it was a convenience and a custom, and since there would of
course be universal consensus to move forward with a different scheme,
there was absolutely no reason to have an episode of civil
disobedience to change it. There was no emergency.
--Jimbo