Perhaps you have never suffered from hate-speech, or are simply insensitive to the matter, Chris. You certainly have a right to disagree with me and even to say this message is unconstructive. But trust me, I am calm, I have thought about this, and I believe it is constructive. What WHEELER wrote is not just a violation of wikicivility, it is an example of hate speech. It served and serves absolutely no purpose at wikipedia, except to use this space as a vehicle for expressing hate speech. I am against that.
Surely this is Arbitration Committee material? They take a while (gosh darn these unpaid volunteers in a job that sucks by definition!), but the results have been sensible so far IMO.
- d.