Maveric149 (Daniel Mayer) wrote in part:
Of course more info is needed! Refining that we could say that they are both widely regarded as terrorist in the West and by nearly all national governments in the Arab world. That is attributing a POV to its adherents. It is also in line with NPOV.
Taking that out would be expressing the minority POV that they are not terrorist.
You've said this a couple times now, but I must disagree strongly.
/Failing/ to state X is *not* equivalent to /denying/ X!!!
So you and Ec may disagree over whether the statement "Many people consider Osama Bin Laden to be a terrorist.", in the absence of additional facts, is sufficiently NPOV; but his position (to remove it in the absence of such facts) does not advocate the opposite POV.
-- Toby