Ed Poor wrote:
I reverted the [[Easter Bradford]] article to the (Revision as of 11:00, 15 Oct 2002), which is credited to user:Easterbradford.
I don't think that Jimbo's message was meant to tell us to comply; he could have reverted the article himself had he wanted to.
What's this all about? And why no discussion first?
We /should/ discuss first! I strongly believe that we shouldn't give in to such threats, except to follow established legal procedures (like the DMCA takedown notices, to cover our collective ass). IIRC, this has come up before, and Bradford's charges were without merit.
-- Toby