Sascha Noyes a écrit:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 08:49 am, Anthere wrote:
Sascha Noyes a écrit:
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 03:09 pm, Poor, Edmund W wrote:
There is a legitimate question about how much human nudity should be shown in Wikipedia.
In your opinion this is a legitimate question. I don't consider it legitimate because I don't consider nudity offensive. (I have previously given the example that if puritans consider exposure to nudity a bad thing for children, they have to in the same vein consider a child looking at their own unclothed body as harmful. That position is patently ridiculous.
Patently ridiculous ? An opinion is patently ridiculous ?
Yes, that is correct. I consider the position that it is harmful to children to look at their nude body to be ridiculous. If you want to make an assertion that something is true, you must offer some evidence that supports that claim. Do you have any such evidence? I should like to see it. I don't subscribe to the wishy-washy notion of not being able to give my opinion about that of another simply because it is their opinion. Which is what you seem to be implying.
Best, Sascha Noyes
As long as you do not write such a thing in Wikipedia without good attribution of someone whose opinion is relevant, I have no problem with that opinion of yours :)
(you might have not understood I was not speaking of the opinion it was harmful or not harmful, but rather of the comment given about such a position)
Am I clear there, I dunno...