Sascha Noyes a écrit:
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 03:09 pm, Poor, Edmund W wrote:
There is a legitimate question about how much human nudity should be shown in Wikipedia.
In your opinion this is a legitimate question. I don't consider it legitimate because I don't consider nudity offensive. (I have previously given the example that if puritans consider exposure to nudity a bad thing for children, they have to in the same vein consider a child looking at their own unclothed body as harmful. That position is patently ridiculous.
Patently ridiculous ? An opinion is patently ridiculous ?