Jimmy Wales wrote:
I've been approached by a major publisher about the possibility of working with us to producing and publish a print edition of Wikipedia. The concept that they are most interested in at the moment is a single large volume, something similar to the Columbia Encyclopedia (a desktop encyclopedia, 3200 pages) or Britannica Concise Encyclopedia (2067 pages).
The Britannica Concise has 28,000 entries. The Columbia has 51,000 entries. I have no idea of estimated word or byte counts for those.
One goal would be to have something ready for market by October 1st, in time for the holiday gift season. I'm unsure of how early before that *we* would need to be ready.
I've only begun talking to them about it, which is why I won't say who it is just yet. But they understand our license and want to work with us.
The question was asked of me, and I ask of the community: can we have something like that ready in time? Or should we shoot for next year?
I have long stated a goal that "Wikipedia 1.0" be ready in December of this year, although we haven't actually made any formal decisions about how we're going to do that.
Considering that just last night, I raised the complaint that 1.0 was the sort of thing that was all talk and no action, I have to react positively to this news. I also believe that getting this project under way may ease the inclusion/deletion wars. The kind of deletions that have raised so many objections on Wikipedia may actually be welcome in 1.0.
How does ready for market by October 1 translate into when the material needs to be ready for printing? The publisher will need time to do his work.
To work in that time scale the first edition has to be quite modest. A lot more can go into the second edition. For now there is a need to decide what topic areas can be included. I think it would be better to have fewer areas, but ones where we can feel sure that a comprehensive presentation can be made. [[Countries of the World]] would be an obvious area, but someone will need to go through all the articles to ensure that all countries have been brought to the same standard.
Editing will need to be a lot more disciplined than has been the case on Wikipedia, with little time for wrangling.
Ec