Plautus adds a lot of bullshit to the wikipedia, but he also has a lot of "fringe" sources to cite. For instance, he apparently thinks that the Columbia Space Shuttle was shot down by a US missile-defense laser; likewise, he thinks that tornados generate some kind of plasma.
Now, it didn't take me long looking at yahoo to see that Plautus may love conspiracy theories; but so do a lot of other people. There are 65,000 websites on the internet which discuss whether, or not, Columbia was shot down.
In short, Plautus is adding the kind of information which the Wikipedia should contain. I will agree that this information should not be presented as NPOV fact, it most certainly should be presented with an "experts tend to disagree" disclaimer -- however, it should NOT be deleted.
People are deleting Plautus' contributions which, while they should be edited, are valid enough that they should not be deleted. If Plautus gets upset over the deletions, it is entirely understandable -- he is being treated poorly, and if anyone should be banned it is those who delete his text while hurling insults at him.
People that disagree with Plautus should edit for NPOV, they should not delete and censor him.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools