Sascha Noyes a écrit:
On Sunday 01 February 2004 01:33 pm, Anthere wrote:
Could someone have a look at the conflict over
Alexander Lukashenko,
between Adam Carr and 172. And give their opinion ?
I hardly dare to say it, but I reverted to a version that is anterior to
december 2003, to insure it was "somehow" stable.
Does it matter _that much_ which version a page is protected on? I'd argue
that it matters less than breaking rule # 2 of the page protection policy.
Best,
Sascha Noyes
I checked what was rule number 2. I saw it was "never protect if you
have edited the page"
I suppose you are trying to tell me now that I have broken rule number 2
in reverting the article to a previous state while protecting it ?
I never edited the article before I made that reversion.
I am *absolutely* not interested by this article
This morning I answered to a request of Adam Carr for mediation.
Mav and I told him there were other steps before mediation.
This evening, I saw no progress, only reversions going on.
I thought in my innocence, that I could protect a page I had never
edited once, since I saw Adam and 172 reverting it on turn.
Bad move !
Last time I protected a page, I was very coldly told I did wrong,
because I protected the current version, and not the stable version.
So, as a good girl, I am careful this time to protect the stable
version, and to list the page in the protected pages
And I did not do the right think again ???
Want me to be very strongly honest here ?
No, I won't, I might break a rule of basic politeness.