I've unblocked you but take heed. The _only_ reason i unblocked you is
because anthony wasn't blocked. You violated the 3RR and so did
desearve the block - note that the three reverts are in a 24 hour
period - so if you revert the night before and again the next morining
you may break the rule without really realising it.
I know you were restoring the consensus version, I know that
sockpuppets were used - but there is no need for you to revert war.
Do your three reverts and then step back from the article - I assure
you that someone else will take up the reigns because as the votes on
the talk page there is an overwhelming majority in favour of having
the picture.
I do not support any action against chrisO. The policy is new, we are
still finding our feet with it.
Please take my advice - a rule is a rule and we all have to follow
them. (If you are going to the wikimeet tomorrow night - I'll see you
there)
Therresa
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:48:28 -0000, John Bradley <john(a)ontobus.co.uk> wrote:
Hi,
I seem to have been disabled for breaking the 3RR. My last 3 msg being 10
hours after the previous bring it to four, and happened when User:Anthony
DiPierro engaged in deliberate vandalism of the Clitoris page. I wasn't
diabled until about 5 hours after the last revert.
User:Anthony DiPierro who revert four times to my three this morning has
been left online by user:ChrisO.
I think my account should be reanabled and User:Anthony DiPierro
disabled and user:ChrisO admin rights should be removed. It seems a
pervers use of the 3RR for whatever reasons.
ChrisO should provide an explanation of his slective and deleyed action.
Yours
John Bradley
Loc: 15/22 Gambier Terrace, Liverpool, L1 7BL, UK.
Phone: +44 (0)151 708 7238
Email: john(a)ontobus.co.uk
WWW:
www.ontobus.co.uk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l