Matthew J. Brown wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Alex Rosen wrote:
>I wasn't aware that there was any "official"
policy as to
whether
>something had to be important, or if it just
had
to be true and
verifiable.
Official or not, many people seem to use an
'important' standard
when it
comes to biographical articles. 'Wiki Is Not
a
Biographical Dictionary'
(wherever that is) describes teh policy a lot seem
to follow.
The rule is that Wikipedia is not a
dictionary,
biographical or
otherwise. That is no bar to biographical articles
which are an
important part of the 'pedia.
Ec
Well, that doesn't explain much. What makes it an
important part of the 'pedia?
LDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search