I've already gone over this several times. Have
you
been reading the mailing
list lately? Loosing contributors who want to have
provocative and offensive
user names would be a good thing since we already
waste enough time with
anonymous trolls.
So far, we haven't heard of anyone leaving because of
offensive usernames, and I doubt that there are any
unnamed people who have left because of that.
Anonymous trolls are completely different. They make
bad edits. People with bad usernames don't necessarily
make bad edits.
You wasted a good deal of editing time from other
contributors by your little
stunt. If you keep doing that type of stuff, then
yes.
The only time wasted was the 1 minute it took to write
an opinion about it on the talk page (per person) and
30 seconds to ban. I don't think the subsequent
mailing list discussion really counts.
Why or why do I have to address everything you
write?
I guess it's inaccurate to say that if you don't
respond to an accusation, it's either because it's
true or you don't have any good argument against it,
but that's what I thought.
I wasn't the person who
banned your user account either. And it has since be
un-banned when we found
out it was you.
Well, I guess it wasn't just you, but still, this is
the first time two people determining that a logged-in
user should be banned is enough.
Yes it was trolling.
-- mav
None of wikipedia was more POV after I used that
username. I didn't threaten anyone. How is it
trolling? What is our definition of trolling?
LDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com