I've already gone over this several times. Have you been reading the mailing list lately? Loosing contributors who want to have provocative and offensive user names would be a good thing since we already waste enough time with anonymous trolls.
So far, we haven't heard of anyone leaving because of offensive usernames, and I doubt that there are any unnamed people who have left because of that.
Anonymous trolls are completely different. They make bad edits. People with bad usernames don't necessarily make bad edits.
You wasted a good deal of editing time from other contributors by your little stunt. If you keep doing that type of stuff, then yes.
The only time wasted was the 1 minute it took to write an opinion about it on the talk page (per person) and 30 seconds to ban. I don't think the subsequent mailing list discussion really counts.
Why or why do I have to address everything you write?
I guess it's inaccurate to say that if you don't respond to an accusation, it's either because it's true or you don't have any good argument against it, but that's what I thought.
I wasn't the person who banned your user account either. And it has since be un-banned when we found out it was you.
Well, I guess it wasn't just you, but still, this is the first time two people determining that a logged-in user should be banned is enough.
Yes it was trolling.
-- mav
None of wikipedia was more POV after I used that username. I didn't threaten anyone. How is it trolling? What is our definition of trolling? LDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com