Rick wrote:
Really? A scatalogical definition of "Fudgepacker" is not indicative of an anti-gay bias?
I reviewed the edits carefully.
The user expanded an existing definition of this word written several months ago by an IP user, and then merged it with "homophobic hate speech," replacing the original entry with a redirect. His expansion of the definition appeared to be in good faith, though there was room for improvement which, due to the power of the wiki, has already been provided by others.
Merging a pejorative term into an article on "homophobic hate speech" and getting it out of the main namespace, IMO, is laudatory, as it makes the nature of the word very clear.
As many contributors are aware, there is a growing number of Chritian churches and congregations that are proponents of equal treatment of GBLT people, and who do not consider GBLT lifestyles and sexual acts sinful. Most prominent among these are the many UCC congregations who have adopted a public "Open and Accepting" stance toward GBLT people. Though small in number of followers, many meetings of the Society of Friends (Quakers) have had such a doctrine for years. And there are a few Catholic congregations that, in spite of official doctrine, publicly support gay and lesbian people and lifestyles.
Louis