I suppose I should not have used the word "likely". It was just too polite. :-)
Cunc could not possibly have unblocked something without it having been blocked, but I'm sorry I keep forgetting that some people have difficulties accepting logical conclusions as evidence :-P
Ec
Rick wrote:
"Likely"? So, in other words, you're talking out of your hat, because you have no evidence to support your contention.
RickK
Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Andrew Lih wrote: >>Ray Saintonge wrote: >>Surely, whoever alleges that Cunc was abusing his sysop powers, must >>recognize that Cunc's opponents were equally guilty of such misdeeds. >> > >RickK and Maximus Rex have clearly listed what, when and where Cunctator >did with his edits. Perhaps you could do the same for the supposedly >"equally guilty" opponents. > Refer to the same articles. If Cunc abused sysop powers by unblocking them, someone had likely abused Sysop powers by blocking it in the first place. Ec