Well, Stan, I admit to getting up late this morning, but please don't use "arrows" as a metaphor. I'm not attacking William. I really like the guy.
I'm just saying that if he's going to edit a Wikipedia article to say that some POV he personally opposes is "clearly false", then he himself should be cited as the source of that POV.
Dr. Connolley is one of the few people (if not the first) at Wikipedia who play simultaneous roles: neutral contributor and authoritative source.
Everyone else has to cite an "expert" as a source when writing articles. I propose that Dr. Connolley is /himself/ a source. So I created a page for him. It's not a vanity page, as some have termed [[Easter Bradford]], because he didn't create it to publicize himself. It's an article about an expert.
Uncle Ed