J. Noel Chiappa wrote:
No, if a mis-spelling gets 70,000 hits it deserves a *redirect*. A name variant only deserves a mention in the article if it's one that people actually consciously use (e.g. Rameses/Ramesses).
But I'm not so sure that 'mis-spelling' is what this is, given that both variants have been used in the titles of books by reputable publishers. I absolutely agree that a redirect is in order -- we don't need two articles here. But I also think that a line or two in the body of the article covering the variant spelling is warranted, since it's something that a reader is likely to wonder about.
--Jimbo