Rick wrote:
Well, if people feel that there is a space for Wikipedia in these devotionals, and others that there is not, there is no middle ground, and therefore what is there to discuss?
Well, for example, the discussion might clarify for you that no one is advocating that _devotionals_ be included.
Why shouldn't they be in the encyclopedia? Because they make Wikipedia look bad. People look at these articles and say, "How can they claim to be a serious encyclopedia when they have articles about how someone is beloved by their dog?"
Is this a specific reference, or a straw man?
--Jimbo