Nonsense and nonsense.
"Takeover"? If you have valid arguments against the deletion, then please
present them. But to just avoid the issue and make ad hominem attacks is not productive.
Please go to VfD and detail, point by point, on each article listed, why they should not
be deleted, and if your arguments are other than, "We shouldn't delete
anything", then your arguments will be taken into account. But those of us who DO
frequent VfD, and feel it's useful, do not delete things just for the sake of
deletion. There are too many articles on the Wikipedia that need to be deleted, unless
someone (perhaps you?) wants to take the time to make all of the useless articles useful
by writing meaningful content.
As for the one vote means don't delete, that's more than ridiculous, that's
the dictatorship of the minority. And there were, and still are, several users who create
accounts solely for the purpose of voting no on any and all items listed on VfD.
RickK
The Cunctator <cunctator(a)kband.com> wrote:
So is the obvious takeover of the VfD page by a horde of deletionists.
Once upon a time one vote against deletion was enough to stop deletion.
And that is all it should take.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard