From: Jimmy Wales> libertarian wrote:
I too was under the impression that the aim of Wikipedia was to present things in an encyclopediac fashion.
It is!
However, when Wikipedia allows allegations ragrding verifiable
events
(especially the allegations of political oppnents) to be posted as a legitimate point of view, the credibility of Wikipedia takes a beating.
What do you mean about 'allows'? If you see a problem, edit it.
<snip>
Can you give an exact reference, including references to diffs of reversions?
<snip>
It sounds like you do understand that, so perhaps if you can give us some specific references to review, that would be helpful.
Jimbo: if you're going to give this kind of advice to other people, you really should follow it yourself. You've been complaining that the Sheldon Rampton entry is biased and is a perfect example of a problem entry, but have given no specific examples or references or made any edits.
Hypocrisy, even if unintentional, does not become you.
--tc