From: Jimmy Wales>
libertarian wrote:
I too was under the impression that the aim of
Wikipedia was to
present things in an encyclopediac fashion.
It is!
> However, when Wikipedia allows allegations ragrding verifiable
events
(especially
the allegations of political oppnents) to be posted as
a legitimate point of view, the credibility of Wikipedia takes a
beating.
What do you mean about 'allows'? If you see a problem, edit it.
<snip>
Can you give an exact reference, including references to diffs of
reversions?
<snip>
It sounds like you do understand that, so perhaps if you can give us
some specific references to review, that would be helpful.
Jimbo: if you're going to give this kind of advice to other people, you
really should follow it yourself. You've been complaining that the
Sheldon Rampton entry is biased and is a perfect example of a problem
entry, but have given no specific examples or references or made any
edits.
Hypocrisy, even if unintentional, does not become you.
--tc